I have a question: why the topic "The Omega of the Deadly Heresies" is closed????

?????????

dejan,

I sent you an email. Did you get it?

Let me explain briefly here: The 1888 Message Study Forum is to promote the message of 1888. It is a part of the websites of the 1888 Message Study Committee. Thus it is important that what is written on this forum be supportive of this message. We do expect that questions and differences will be discussed.

Several of the 1888 Message Study Committee examined what you wrote in the "Loud Cry and Elijah Message" and found it not appropriate to our purpose. We respect your view points and your right to express them. I sent you a list of other SDA forums that might be more appropriate to your views.

If you did not get my email, please let me know.

Hubert F. Sturges
hfsturges@gmail.com

Thank you for your answer. I didn't receive your e-mail.

If this site is truly an 1888 messages, why this forum does not promote protestantism where varied views were respected regardless we agree it or not? Are we an arbiter of truth? are we to judge other views as totally heretic just because we don't agree with them? History told us that this the spirit of antichrist. I pray that this moderator of this forum will accept the principle of protestantism if he was truly a man and a protestant. This what Waggoner and Jones preach and taught. And this Righteousness by Faith.

May TRUE RBF will be preach here.

(04-01-2009 12:51 PM)juneph Wrote:  If this site is truly an 1888 messages, why this forum does not promote protestantism where varied views were respected regardless we agree it or not? Are we an arbiter of truth? are we to judge other views as totally heretic just because we don't agree with them? History told us that this the spirit of antichrist. I pray that this moderator of this forum will accept the principle of protestantism if he was truly a man and a protestant. This what Waggoner and Jones preach and taught. And this Righteousness by Faith.

May TRUE RBF will be preach here.

Thank's Juneph. I agree with you.

Ellen white wrote:

"The fact that there is no controversy or agitation among God's people, should not be regarded as conclusive evidence that they are holding fast to sound doctrine. There is reason to fear that they may not be clearly discriminating between truth and error. When no new questions are started by investigation of the Scriptures, when no difference of opinion arises which will set men to searching the Bible for themselves, to make sure that they have the truth, there will be many now, as in ancient times, who will hold to tradition, and worship they know not what.
Our brethren should be willing to investigate in a candid way every point of controversy. When a doctrine is presented that does not meet our minds, we should go to the word of God, seek the Lord in prayer, and give no place for the enemy to come in with suspicion and prejudice. We should never permit the spirit to be manifested that arraigned the priests and rulers against the Redeemer of the world. They complained that He disturbed the people, and they wished He would let them alone; for He caused perplexity and dissension. The Lord sends light to us to prove what manner of spirit we are of. We are not to deceive ourselves." GW 298-302

Dear brothers from 1888MSC, please didn't alow the spirit of the rulers and priest (and also the spirit of the brothers from 1888) take control over you.

It is truly sad that nobody (exept hfstrurges) attempt to show me where I am wrong but simply deleted the topic. Why? Maybe because they know that this is the truth?

This forum is not for attacking people or their characters. Please don't attack the moderator. He is simply trying to explain why the decision was made. That doesn't mean he personally made the decision. We need to have a Christ-like attitude as we post, even when posting differences of opinion. I don't think Christ would approve of attacks on a person's manhood and faith. (I highlighted the area that was posted that I consider an attack to the moderator's character).

(04-01-2009 12:51 PM)juneph Wrote:  If this site is truly an 1888 messages, why this forum does not promote protestantism where varied views were respected regardless we agree it or not? Are we an arbiter of truth? are we to judge other views as totally heretic just because we don't agree with them? History told us that this the spirit of antichrist. I pray that this moderator of this forum will accept the principle of protestantism if he was truly a man and a protestant. This what Waggoner and Jones preach and taught. And this Righteousness by Faith.

May TRUE RBF will be preach here.

(04-17-2009 12:38 AM)kirola Wrote:  This forum is not for attacking people or their characters. Please don't attack the moderator. He is simply trying to explain why the decision was made. That doesn't mean he personally made the decision. We need to have a Christ-like attitude as we post, even when posting differences of opinion. I don't think Christ would approve of attacks on a person's manhood and faith. (I highlighted the area that was posted that I consider an attack to the moderator's character).

(04-01-2009 12:51 PM)juneph Wrote:  If this site is truly an 1888 messages, why this forum does not promote protestantism where varied views were respected regardless we agree it or not? Are we an arbiter of truth? are we to judge other views as totally heretic just because we don't agree with them? History told us that this the spirit of antichrist. I pray that this moderator of this forum will accept the principle of protestantism if he was truly a man and a protestant. This what Waggoner and Jones preach and taught. And this Righteousness by Faith.

May TRUE RBF will be preach here.

I agree with you, Kirola. I personally have nothing against the moderator (or others members of 1888MSC). I only protested against their decision to block and delete my topic. I believe their decision is wrong because the truth about God and Christ is a part of 1888 Message and RBF. You can read the Waggoner's book "Christ and His Righteousness" and can see that. My question is: if I am wrong and Waggoner was wrong, why they didn't alowed fair discussion and showed me where I am wrong?

But if they decided so, I will respect their decision.

(04-17-2009 12:38 AM)kirola Wrote:  This forum is not for attacking people or their characters. Please don't attack the moderator. He is simply trying to explain why the decision was made. That doesn't mean he personally made the decision. We need to have a Christ-like attitude as we post, even when posting differences of opinion. I don't think Christ would approve of attacks on a person's manhood and faith. (I highlighted the area that was posted that I consider an attack to the moderator's character).

(04-01-2009 12:51 PM)juneph Wrote:  If this site is truly an 1888 messages, why this forum does not promote protestantism where varied views were respected regardless we agree it or not? Are we an arbiter of truth? are we to judge other views as totally heretic just because we don't agree with them? History told us that this the spirit of antichrist. I pray that this moderator of this forum will accept the principle of protestantism if he was truly a man and a protestant. This what Waggoner and Jones preach and taught. And this Righteousness by Faith.

May TRUE RBF will be preach here.

Kirola i did not attack the moderator.What i am just trying to say is that if we truly claim to be a protestant and promote the 1888 messages we should respect other religious views even if we differ with them.Not delete them as if we are afraid that some will read the thread and make desicion what is truth and what is not.

Let us all remember that when we try to shun the light from others we will be accountable to God for the act that we've done just because of our personal prejudice.

Kirola I ask you, Will you dare to shun others from seeking the truth just because we are prejudiced and it does not agree with our view?